Re: [-empyre-] alternate i.d.conceptions

[linda <linda@machinehunger.com.au>]

hi all

> ..i'm really curious regarding sense orientation whilst occupying 
> net-based worlds.....the transferral of sentience in[2] 
> text-or-web.based domains via telesthesia........ie if its the 
> product of collusive growth-patterns [eg thru consensual 
> hallucinatory or simply assumed corporealities] or something 
> else..........


'collusive growth patterns' has such an organic base to it.... what 
of biodiversity within this vast territory? and endangered species....

> ....my language use is more a ][crucial][ by-product of responding 2 
> data fluctuations swirling thru the niche of the net which i 
> n.habit.....strands of reoccurring infomatics, or occurrences 
> involving surrounding  n.tities......the selection of incidents & 
> stylistics vary according 2 which programmer languages|net.scripting 
> formulas i'm manipulating|aping.... most ppl who r x.posed 2 these 
> wurks don't have a clue about this underlying format|structure,

maybe u cd talk a bit more about this aspect of the practice, ie the 
formulas and languages -- and also about the point where they leave 
the field of authorship, the point where the netwurkers float off 
from having anything to do with u/mez -- if this is in fact at all 
really possible ..  as they are based on 'your' text -- its cadences 
and patterns . do you often use other texts, random texts and has 
this latter aspect changed over time?


> ...in relation 2 the i.d templates, they function more as cues 
> regarding co(i)ntent than actual avatars [which is y i prefer 2 tag 
> them _netwurkers_].........


in this sense they are what they say (they are)



linda